Skip to main content Skip to navigation
Providing free information and advice since 1999

Industry News   |  Mar 24, 2025   |  5 Comments  |  

Public transport access

Public transport access “embarrassment”

“It should be a source of national embarrassment that our country’s transport services effectively treat disabled people as second class citizens…”

The parliamentary Transport Committee has published its report, and the words above come from the chair, Ruth Cadbury, giving a powerful impression of the shortcomings they uncovered.
 

Access needs widely disregarded

From accounts of wheelchair users left on planes for hours, to taxi drivers refusing lifts to people because they have an assistance dog, and street clutter causing obstructions, MPs received shocking evidence of widespread failure by providers, across all transport modes, to uphold the rights of people with access needs.

The cross-party Committee’s report also finds that progress with addressing disparities between disabled and non-disabled people’s access to services has in some cases gone into reverse since the Covid pandemic, despite policy aspirations to close the gap.

In evidence heard by the previous Committee, before the 2024 general election, people with access needs – including non-visible disabilities such as autism, dementia, severe anxiety and learning disabilities – told the Committee that the stresses caused by poor reliability and a lack of assistance discourage them from trying to travel at all.

A survey conducted by the Committee, which received 825 responses, found that 67% of disabled people, or those who assist them, encounter problems using transport either “always” or “most of the time”. Just 1.7% said they never experienced challenges when travelling. A further 50.8% said that at least one a month they would decide against making a journey because they expected to face difficulties whilst travelling.
 

Transport Committee Chair Ruth Cadbury said:

“It should be a source of national embarrassment that our country’s transport services effectively treat disabled people as second class citizens, denying them access to jobs, leisure, support networks and essential services – denying them their rights.

“This inquiry worked on the premise that people are disabled by barriers in society, not by their condition or difference, and that services should be designed to enable disabled people to travel independently, not reliant on others. After all, services that work for disabled people also work better for everyone.

“And yet, those who have been let down and want redress or compensation face a spaghetti junction of complaints processes that either fob them off or lead them on a road to nowhere. Even when complaints are resolved, lessons aren’t learnt, changes aren’t put in place, and it’s tempting to think that the small and occasional penalties for failure are accepted by providers as a mere cost of doing business.

“Failures must go from being an everyday occurrence to vanishingly rare. In its reforms to transport services over this Parliament, the Government must ensure people with access needs no longer go unseen, unheard and unacknowledged. This should be underpinned with a new inclusive transport strategy, backed by long-term funding.

“As a Committee, we would like to thank the many charities, experts, campaigners – including disabled people who have lived with inadequate services – for giving evidence to this Committee and its predecessor before the general election. We look forward to working constructively with the Government and tracking its progress over the coming years.”

Key recommendations on public transport access

• Across the transport system, accessibility for disabled people must be recognised as a human right rather than a ‘nice to have’. Failures should be seen as discrimination, not merely as a customer service issue. A change of mindset is needed at all levels among providers, regulators and enforcers.

• Disabled people who experience inadequate services shoulder too great a burden when making complaints, seeking redress or taking legal action against transport providers big or small. This comes at the expense of their own time, energy and cost. The Committee heard that even successful complaints rarely lead to lasting change. A unified, user-friendly complaints service should be established within 12 months to cover all transport modes.

• The landscape of regulations, legal duties and enforcement bodies is far too fragmented and complex. The law should work in theory but reality is very different. A review of all relevant legislation and the powers and resources of enforcement bodies is needed so that no transport mode is left uncovered. This review should assess whether a single enforcement body would be more effective at asserting disabled people’s rights. Until then, the Transport Secretary should direct all existing enforcement bodies to take a proactive approach to enforcement. 

• Within 12 months the Government must produce new, long-term, fully costed inclusive transport strategy to make both radical improvements across the transport network and closes the gap between rights and reality.

• As part of the new inclusive transport strategy, the Government must produce a road map with concrete timescales for achieving independent accessibility across the rail network. This new policy should inform upgrades to rolling stock, station and network enhancements. MPs heard international comparisons such as Vienna’s U-Bahn has a long-term plan to make all of its stations accessible. New York City has a plan to make 95% of its stations accessible by 2055, while the Netherlands aims to improve its entire rail network by 2030.

• The new inclusive transport strategy should include steps to make policy and decision-making processes more responsive to accessibility, particularly when decisions are made around staffing levels and staff training. The strategy should also set out practical measures to embed the principle that every instance of not meeting accessibility obligations constitutes a serious failure, for which service providers will be held accountable. This must include measures to collect comprehensive data on such failures.

Article ends – click to return to top or check out related resources below

Further reading and resources

Worth Every Step – Active travel strategy launched

Transforming Mobility – Report from Sustrans and Transport for All

Office for Road and Rail is reviewing its guidance on Accessible Travel Policies

Visually impaired travellers in Scotland can take a companion by rail for free

Manchester Piccadilly now has a dedicated assisted travel lounge

TGA teams up with Northern to make train travel easier with a mobility scooter or wheelchair

Take a look at the disabled access tube map, showing how few London underground stations provide step-free access

We have more about accessible travel in Britain and abroad, here

Disability Action Yorkshire and passenger accessibility

We have an Independent Living Facebook group, where you can discuss any issues that concern you as a disabled person or carer

 

5 Replies to “Public transport access”

    Julia Norman says:

    Its a national scandal that people with disabilities have to struggle to get anywhere. I believe more education is needed to make people aware of the difficulties faced by the less abled. Today in Clifton, Bristol I witnessed a wheelchair use being unable to cross the road because some thoughtless person had parked across a dropped curb. Also, cars park on the pavement making it totally impossible for anyone in a wheelchair to use it, they would have to endanger their lives by going along the road. Or never going out.

    Marion Valder says:

    Deaf people’s needs are often ignored. The NHS is particularly bad in this respect often insisting on communication by phone which I can’t use and refusing contact by text or e.mail.

    J Redcliffe says:

    A good inclusive transport system would transform the lives of many “disabled” people who are invisible to planners. Very few have someone readily available to spare the time or energy to accompany them when and where they want to go so….they don’t go. Who cares? NO ONE.

    .Incidentally, I put “disabled” in inverted commas because the elderly with mobility problems are lumped in with people dementing, or autistic, or….It is enough to be over a certain age and have a cold to be filed as “fragile” .- a signal from one bureaucrat to another to err on the side of caution from the point of view of insurance(possibility of neglect), not health. If you live longer the danger is greater.

    Carol Macgowan says:

    The other label is ‘vulnerable’, similar to fragile.
    So I assume that means we should be stuck in a care home to get rid of us.
    Huntingtons Patient, bedbound, very happy at home with good carers and his wife, arthritic old lady, are quite happy at home. Online shopping, phone calls and emails to family. But we are the lucky ones.
    Next fight is CHC review in few weeks. I need to re-read Beacon Trust and Care to be Different advice books I bought. How to get the NHS to pay.

    We know our abilities and some ways of working round them. Advice welcome, but if it doesn’t work speak out, medical and disability ‘specialists’ need to know so they can learn too.
    If you don’t ask you won’t get. Find out what you can have, try specialist websites, ask the District Nurses, care companies, hospital staff and neighbours.

    Jenny Jeff says:

    https://www.euansguide.com/

    I recently stumbled across this charity that is trying to address this specific issue and encourages disabled people to leave reviews on good and bad experiences of traveling in the uk.

    “Welcome to Euan’s Guide
    We’re the disabled access charity best known for EuansGuide.com, the disabled access review website. But we also make tens of thousands of accessible toilets safer, run the UK’s largest Access Survey and lots more.”The aim of Euan’s Guide is to empower disabled people by providing information that will give confidence and choices for getting out and about. “Euan MacDonald, Founder of Euan’s Guide.”

Leave a Comment or Ask a Question:

You are providing your name and email address to Independent Living, so that we can communicate with you, if necessary, about your comment. Your privacy is very important, so please note that we won’t contact you for any other purpose, and your details will not be shared with any third party.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.